The Budget's Jobs Forecast Looks Calm. The Risk Underneath Is Not.

The Federal Budget presents a relatively calm labour market story: unemployment edges higher, growth slows, wages hold up and the economy avoids a major jobs shock. That may be the central forecast. But for employers, candidates and investors, the more important question is what sits underneath that forecast.

The headline unemployment rate is useful, but it can hide turning points in hiring confidence.

Australia may not be heading for a deep labour market downturn. But the Budget does point to a more selective employment market, and some of the policy settings may make it harder for new businesses to create the next wave of jobs.

The official forecast is mild. That is exactly why it needs scrutiny.

The Australian Government’s 2026-27 Budget Paper No. 1 says the labour market remains resilient and is “well placed to withstand slower economic growth in 2026-27”. Treasury forecasts unemployment rising from 4.25 per cent in the June quarter 2026 to 4.5 per cent in the June quarters of 2027 and 2028, before easing to 4.25 per cent by 2029-30.

On paper, that is a soft landing.

The problem is that labour markets rarely weaken evenly. Hiring can slow well before unemployment becomes alarming. Businesses delay replacement roles. Startup founders stretch runway. Finance leaders ask for stronger justification before approving headcount. Candidates still employed become more reluctant to move.

That is the more realistic recruitment picture: not mass job losses, but more friction.

The latest ABS Labour Force release adds a more immediate warning signal. In April 2026, seasonally adjusted employment fell by 18,600 people and the unemployment rate rose by 0.2 percentage points to 4.5 per cent.

One month does not prove a trend. But it does make the Budget’s smooth forecast feel less comfortable.

Why hiring can cool before unemployment looks bad

The Budget links slower growth to higher global oil prices, inflation pressure and weaker real household income growth. Treasury expects real GDP growth to slow from 2.25 per cent in 2025-26 to 1.75 per cent in 2026-27, before recovering to 2.25 per cent in 2027-28.

That matters because hiring follows confidence, not just current workload. When growth slows and costs rise, employers often keep essential roles open but delay marginal ones.

This is especially true in accounting and finance. Finance teams are close to the numbers. They see margin pressure, cost escalation, lower demand, debt servicing pressure and cash flow strain before the broader labour market catches up.

The RBA’s May 2026 Statement on Monetary Policy takes a similar view. It expects labour market conditions to ease and unemployment to rise to 4.7 per cent by mid-2028 as weaker activity weighs on labour demand.

The key point for employers is this: if you wait until the unemployment rate clearly turns, the best candidates may already have become harder to move. Uncertainty makes strong performers more cautious, not less.

The Big 4 signal is not panic. It is moderation.

Deloitte’s labour market commentary points to employment growth easing. Deloitte Access Economics has forecast employment growth slowing from 1.8 per cent in calendar year 2025 to 1.1 per cent in 2026, before improving in 2027.

KPMG’s labour market update also points to moderation beneath the headline unemployment rate. KPMG notes that annual employment growth had slowed to 1.1 per cent by December 2025 and expects unemployment to trend towards 4.4 per cent by the end of 2026, with employment growth weakening further as sector demand cools.

PwC frames the Budget as a balance between immediate global shocks and longer term reform. EY’s Budget commentary warned that the Budget needed to avoid adding to inflation pressure.

For recruitment, the message is not that the market is falling apart. It is that the easy phase of hiring may be over. Employers are likely to become more deliberate, more cost conscious and more demanding about the commercial value of each appointment.

CGT and negative gearing could matter more for jobs than the headline suggests

The most underappreciated employment risk in the Budget may not be the unemployment forecast at all. It may be how the tax changes affect private investment, confidence and job creation.

The Government’s tax reform material says the 50 per cent CGT discount will be replaced with a system that taxes real capital gains above inflation, with a 30 per cent minimum tax on capital gains from 1 July 2027. The stated policy intent is fairness and sustainability, but the employment impact will depend partly on how investors, founders and venture capital markets respond.

This is not a theoretical concern. Startup employment depends heavily on capital formation. Young companies often hire before they are profitable. Engineers, salespeople, finance leads, operations managers and customer teams are commonly funded by capital raised against future growth.

If the tax return from high risk startup investment is reduced, capital may become more cautious. Investors may demand higher returns, take fewer risks, favour more mature businesses, or look offshore. Founders may also think differently about where to build, scale and eventually exit.

BDO’s Federal Budget analysis for private equity and venture capital notes that the reforms may affect the venture capital lifecycle, including returns for investors and incentives connected to exit outcomes. Forbes Australia and the Australian Financial Review have also reported founder and venture capital concern about how the CGT overhaul could affect startup competitiveness.

The negative gearing change adds another layer. The Government says negative gearing for new investments will be limited to new builds from 1 July 2027, while existing investments will be grandfathered. The policy is designed to redirect investment toward new housing supply rather than established property.

That may support construction if it successfully shifts capital into new dwellings. But it also creates a transition risk. Property investors, developers, lenders and related professional services firms may pause or reprice decisions while the detail settles. In sectors linked to housing, construction, finance and advisory work, uncertainty can affect hiring before it appears in unemployment data.

This does not mean the Budget will automatically damage startup employment. The Government has also announced business and productivity measures, including support for investment and innovation.

But from a recruitment perspective, the concern is practical. If founders, investors, developers or business owners become more cautious, hiring plans become more cautious too. A role that would have been approved immediately may become a “wait until the next funding milestone” or “wait until the policy detail is clear” decision. That is how job creation slows before it appears clearly in the national unemployment rate.

The recruitment impact: fewer speculative hires, more evidence required

For accounting and finance teams, a softer labour market does not remove talent pressure. It changes where the pressure sits.

Employers may see more candidates in some areas, but the best candidates will still be difficult to secure. Businesses will continue to need people who can protect margin, improve reporting, manage cash, support systems change and provide clearer commercial insight.

The roles most exposed are likely to be speculative growth hires. The roles most protected are likely to be those tied directly to control, revenue, cash flow, compliance or productivity.

In a stronger market, speed often wins. In a more cautious market, evidence wins.

What employers should do now

The wrong response is to freeze hiring completely. That often creates more pressure later, particularly in finance teams where reporting, compliance and cash flow disciplines cannot simply pause.

A better response is to sharpen the hiring brief. If the Budget’s forecasts are right, unemployment will rise only gradually. Employers should not assume talent will suddenly become cheap or easy to find. They should instead become more disciplined about which roles matter and why.

Practical steps include:

• identify which roles directly support cost control, cash flow, compliance, revenue or productivity;
• separate “nice to have” hires from critical business capability gaps;
• move quickly when a strong candidate is available;
• avoid job descriptions that try to combine three roles into one;
• test for judgement, resilience and commercial impact, not just technical experience;
• for startups, connect every hire to runway, funding milestones and measurable growth.

What candidates should do now

Candidates should not panic about the unemployment forecast. A mid-4 per cent unemployment rate is still low compared with many historical periods.

But the market is becoming more selective. Candidates who can clearly explain how they improved reporting, reduced risk, supported decisions, protected cash or helped a business navigate pressure will stand out.

This is especially true in accounting and finance. Employers are not only looking for people who can complete tasks. They are looking for people who can help them make better decisions in a more uncertain economy.

The bottom line

The Budget points to a labour market that is cooling, not collapsing. But that should not be mistaken for comfort.

The risk is not only that unemployment rises. The risk is that new job creation slows in the parts of the economy Australia needs most: productive businesses, growth companies and startups with the capacity to scale.

For employers, hiring should become more disciplined. For candidates, the best opportunities will favour people who can show practical value, commercial judgement and resilience. For policymakers, the CGT debate should not be viewed only through the lens of tax fairness. It should also be viewed through the lens of investment, risk taking and the jobs that do not exist yet.

The unemployment rate may edge higher, but the deeper question is whether Australia is doing enough to encourage the next generation of employers to hire.

Hiring accounting or finance talent?

Byron Thomas Recruitment helps employers navigate changing market conditions and identify accounting, finance and executive talent with the technical strength and commercial judgement businesses need.

Talk to our team

Sources

1. Australian Government: Budget Paper No. 1, 2026-27
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Labour Force, Australia, April 2026
3. Reserve Bank of Australia: Statement on Monetary Policy, May 2026
4. Deloitte Australia: Federal Budget 2026-27
5. Deloitte Access Economics: Employment Forecasts
6. KPMG Australia: Australian Labour Market Update
7. PwC Australia: Federal Budget 2026-27 Insights
8. Capital Brief: 2026 budget must avoid adding to inflation, EY
9. Australian Government: Tax reform, Budget 2026-27
10. BDO Australia: Federal Budget 2026 tax shake-up for PE and VC
11. Forbes Australia: Founders and VCs react to capital gains overhaul
12. Australian Financial Review: Tech leaders call for startup CGT carve-out